You're Trying My Patience, Try Pink Carnations

It is a common axiom that "all is fair in love, war, and politics," but this just seems to be a bit below the proverbial belt.
I realize that I have not been providing updates of my current reading in quite some time, but I can no longer write without talking about my current project. For the past week, I have been reading Dr. Armand Nicholi, Jr.'s "The Question of God." The book is intended to operate as a fictional dialogue between Sigmund Freud and C.S. Lewis due to their positions in the 20th Century as the strongest proponents of the worldviews of materialism and spirituality respectively.
I will wait until the I finish the book to offer my final opinion/recommendation, but at this point I would like to make an observation on the work of Nicholi. The book is intended to operate as a dialogue between two great thinkers without external interference from the author, but one of the most difficult things to do when writing is to remain entirely neutral, especially on a topic as momentous as the development of one's personal worldview.

1 Comments:
Dude, I totally understand you... That's the problem I have when I read Peter Kreeft. A lot of people like his writings, mostly dialogues, about C.S. Lewis, but to me it seems all so one sided. For a reference check out one of his dialogues called "Between Heaven and Hell." It's an interesting premise since the dialogue is between 3 very influential people of the 20th century who all died on the same day (Aldous Huxley, John F. Kennedy, and C.S. Lewis), but the problem I have with it is that he makes Huxley look like an ignorant pantheist who doesn't really know what he's talking about, he makes JFK look like a 40 yr old man trapped in a 8 yr old mind, and he makes C.S. Lewis look like a God.
Post a Comment
<< Home